The Qualcomm SM6375 is a mid-range mobile SoC (System on Chip), designed for smartphones and connected devices. It belongs to Qualcomm's Snapdragon 6 series and is built on 6nm process technology. It is equipped with features like 4G LTE support, AI capabilities, and enhanced graphics processing for gaming and multimedia.

The SM6375 is an octa-core chip, using a Kyro 6-series CPU with a combination of high-performance and power-efficient cores. It also integrates an Adreno GPU for graphics and supports key features like camera enhancements, Wi-Fi, and Bluetooth.

If you're looking for equivalent ICs to the Qualcomm SM6375, you would want to consider other mid-range mobile processors or system-on-chip (SoC) solutions from different manufacturers that target similar applications in the mid-range smartphone market. Here are some possible alternatives:

1. MediaTek Dimensity 700

• MediaTek Dimensity 700 is a 5G-capable SoC designed for mid-range smartphones and offers solid performance in terms of AI and camera features, similar to the Qualcomm SM6375.

• Key Features:

  • Octa-core CPU: ARM Cortex-A76 (2.2 GHz) + Cortex-A55 (2.0 GHz).

  • 5G support (sub-6 GHz).

  • Mali-G57 MC2 GPU for graphics.

  • Support for dual cameras, AI-based camera enhancements, and video capabilities.

  • Power-efficient design for mid-range devices.

• Comparison: The Dimensity 700 offers 5G support, making it an upgrade over the SM6375 (which is 4G-only). It is a strong competitor for mid-range 5G smartphones.

2. MediaTek Helio G95

• The Helio G95 is part of MediaTek’s G-series, which is specifically designed for gaming and performance-oriented smartphones in the mid-range category.

• Key Features:

  • Octa-core CPU: ARM Cortex-A76 (2.05 GHz) + Cortex-A55 (2.0 GHz).

  • Mali-G76 MC4 GPU for better gaming performance.

  • Enhanced AI and camera features.

  • 4G LTE (no 5G support).

• Comparison: The Helio G95 is a strong alternative for 4G-only mid-range smartphones. While it lacks 5G support, its focus on gaming and multimedia performance makes it a good choice for users prioritizing those features.

3. Samsung Exynos 850

• The Samsung Exynos 850 is a budget-to-mid-range SoC targeting affordable smartphones, providing a balance of power efficiency and reasonable performance.

• Key Features:

  • Octa-core CPU: ARM Cortex-A55 cores (1.8 GHz).

  • Mali-G52 GPU for basic graphics needs.

  • 4G LTE connectivity (no 5G).

  • Focus on power efficiency for entry-level and mid-range devices.

• Comparison: The Exynos 850 offers solid performance for 4G LTE devices but lags behind the SM6375 in terms of AI capabilities and gaming performance. It's best suited for entry-level to mid-range devices without 5G requirements.

4. Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G

• The Snapdragon 480 5G is a 5G-capable SoC in Qualcomm's Snapdragon 4 series, designed for budget-friendly smartphones with 5G connectivity.

• Key Features:

  • Octa-core CPU: ARM Cortex-A76 (2.0 GHz) + Cortex-A55 (1.8 GHz).

  • Adreno 619 GPU for solid graphics.

  • 5G support (sub-6 GHz).

  • Focus on value-for-money and 5G performance in entry-level smartphones.

• Comparison: The Snapdragon 480 is a more budget-focused chip than the SM6375, but it offers 5G connectivity in the entry-level smartphone market. The SM6375 would typically perform better in terms of overall processing power and features.

5. Unisoc T618

• Unisoc (formerly Spreadtrum) produces T-series SoCs targeted at mid-range smartphones. The Unisoc T618 is one of their more capable offerings.

• Key Features:

  • Octa-core CPU: ARM Cortex-A75 (2.0 GHz) + Cortex-A55 (2.0 GHz).

  • Mali-G52 MP2 GPU for decent graphics performance.

  • 4G LTE support.

  • AI-enhanced features for photography and video.

• Comparison: The Unisoc T618 is a good alternative for 4G-only devices. It offers solid AI capabilities and decent camera performance, but lacks 5G support, which is offered by competitors like MediaTek and Qualcomm.

6. Qualcomm Snapdragon 662

• The Snapdragon 662 is an older mid-range SoC from Qualcomm, but it’s still a relevant option for budget-friendly smartphones.

• Key Features:

  • Octa-core CPU: ARM Cortex-A73 (2.0 GHz) + Cortex-A53 (1.8 GHz).

  • Adreno 610 GPU.

  • 4G LTE support.

  • AI and camera features.

• Comparison: The Snapdragon 662 is relatively older than the SM6375 but still offers solid performance for mid-range 4G devices. However, its GPU and AI capabilities are not as advanced as the SM6375.

7. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G

• The Snapdragon 695 is a 5G-capable SoC in Qualcomm’s mid-tier lineup, designed for mid-range smartphones with a focus on 5G and multimedia performance.

• Key Features:

  • Octa-core CPU: ARM Cortex-A78 (2.2 GHz) + Cortex-A55 (1.8 GHz).

  • Adreno 619 GPU.

  • 5G support (sub-6 GHz).

  • Enhanced AI, camera, and gaming features.

• Comparison: The Snapdragon 695 offers 5G support and solid performance, making it a more advanced alternative compared to the SM6375 in terms of future-proofing for 5G devices.

8. Apple A13 Bionic (for Apple Devices)

• For devices like iPhones, Apple’s A13 Bionic SoC offers superior performance but at a higher price point.

• Key Features:

  • 6-core CPU (2 high-performance cores + 4 high-efficiency cores).

  • 4-core GPU.

  • Support for advanced machine learning and camera processing.

  • 4G LTE support (no 5G).

• Comparison: While the A13 Bionic is typically used in older iPhones, it offers higher performance in both CPU and GPU capabilities than the SM6375, but it is primarily available in Apple devices.

Key Considerations:

When comparing these SoCs to the Qualcomm SM6375, it's important to consider the following factors:

• 5G Support: The SM6375 does not support 5G connectivity. If 5G is important, look for alternatives like the MediaTek Dimensity 700 or Qualcomm Snapdragon 695.

• AI and Multimedia: If you are focusing on AI features, camera performance, or gaming, check the GPU capabilities and the AI-enhanced features in each chip.

• Power Efficiency: The SM6375 is built on a 6nm process, so it offers excellent power efficiency compared to older or less optimized chips.

• Price Range: The SM6375 is a mid-range SoC, so alternatives like the Snapdragon 480 and Unisoc T618 may be more budget-friendly, while the Dimensity 700 and Snapdragon 695 are better for 5G-enabled devices.

Conclusion:

The Qualcomm SM6375 is a capable mid-range SoC with good performance and features, but it lacks 5G support. The most comparable alternatives include MediaTek Dimensity 700, Qualcomm Snapdragon 695, and Unisoc T618, with the Dimensity 700 providing 5G support and a good balance of performance. If you are focusing on a 4G-only device, chips like the Helio G95 or Snapdragon 662 may also offer strong alternatives.